Tribes that have compacts and would directly benefit from it have promised to share 15% of the revenue from sports betting with tribes like the Lytton Rancheria that are part of the state’s Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Trust Fund. The San Pablo casino operates Class II electronic bingo machines and not Class III gaming like blackjack, craps, roulette and slot machines that would require a compact.īut the Lytton Rancheria still could financially benefit from Prop 26. The Lytton Rancheria does not have a compact with the state, which would be needed to authorize gambling. The one that could more clearly affect the Lytton Casino, and consequently, San Pablo, is Prop 26.ĭoug Elmets, a spokesperson for the casino and the Lytton Rancheria of California - the tribe that owns the San Pablo Lytton Casino - said the tribe has not taken a position on either proposition. On Tuesday, there are two measures on the ballot involving tribal casinos and gambling: Propositions 26 and 27. The only casino in West Contra Costa County, Lytton Casino is the largest contributor to San Pablo’s city budget, accounting for 60% of the city’s General Fund revenue. This is the San Pablo Lytton Casino on a Sunday night. Rows of machines are packed tightly together and nearly every seat is filled. Her machine dings and flashes bright, colorful lights, like the many others around her. Next to him, a middle-aged woman in a bejeweled T-shirt and pink hoodie raises her arms in the air with pure joy, excitedly stamping her feet. He reaches into the back pocket of his jeans, pulls out a thick wad of $20 bills, and feeds the electronic bingo machine in between his frustration-filled hits.

A man in a baseball cap repeatedly slams his balled up fist against a large, red button.

San pablo lytton casino san pablo ca